From: Laurent Daudelin (laurent_daudelin_at_fanniemae.com)
Date: Fri Oct 03 2003 - 07:33:13 PDT
I agree I didn't read much, but if you're right in that you can flash the
ROM (well, if you can flash them, they must not be ROM but some EEPROM or
NVRAM), then it's a lot more interesting...
-Laurent.
-- =========================================================================== Laurent Daudelin Developer, Multifamily, ESO, Fannie Mae mailto:Laurent_Daudelin_at_fanniemae.com Washington, DC, USA ************************* Usual disclaimers apply ************************* > From: "Jim Siburt" <jsiburt_at_mac.com> > Reply-To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net > Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 10:12:59 -0400 > To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net > Subject: Re: [NTLK] T3 vs tapwave > > On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 09:28 AM, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >> on 03/10/03 06:52, doppler at roman_at_pixell.net wrote: >> >>> seriously, >>> >>> i cant understand why the T3 causes such a havoc within the newton >>> community; tapwaves sodiac http://www.tapwave.com/ represents a more >>> interesting alternative, IMO. >>> >>> BTW, the zodiac mgmt team is former newton inc workers, afaik >> >> Yes, only if you're looking for a gaming platform, not a Newton >> replacement. > > I actually have been looking at the Zodiac for that possibility only > because it can be flashed to use different ROMs. Meaning that just > using the hardware, which is pretty impressive, and a GUI / ROM that is > more Newtonesque it could potentially be a viable intuitive device. But > that is only speculation I'll be looking at the SDK in a few weeks and > will know more then. Although I do love my Zaurus as well as my eMate. > : ) -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 08:00:00 PDT