Re: [NTLK] How is the Newton a Mac?

From: Mike R. Manzano (alephx01_at_mac.com)
Date: Thu Apr 01 2004 - 12:03:34 PST

• Next message: Brian Pearce: "Re: [NTLK] How is the Newton a Mac?"
• Previous message: Chris Edwards: "Re: [NTLK] How is the Newton a Mac?"
• In reply to: Chris Edwards: "Re: [NTLK] How is the Newton a Mac?"
• Next in thread: Brian Pearce: "Re: [NTLK] How is the Newton a Mac?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hate to disagree, but I don't know anyone who calls their non-mac
Apples "macs".

I do remember, however, that many people had the mistaken notion that
the Newton had a Mac-like interface, which it decidedly does not.

Regards,

Mike

On Apr 1, 2004, at 11:54 AM, Chris Edwards wrote:

> Yup they all have the same parents, most people call their apples
> "macs" it has become generic, plus did jobs not kill off all to favor
> the macintosh, and did he not kill the newt in a fit of pique?
> therefore the use is reasonable.
> Chris Edwards

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

• Next message: Brian Pearce: "Re: [NTLK] How is the Newton a Mac?"
• Previous message: Chris Edwards: "Re: [NTLK] How is the Newton a Mac?"
• In reply to: Chris Edwards: "Re: [NTLK] How is the Newton a Mac?"
• Next in thread: Brian Pearce: "Re: [NTLK] How is the Newton a Mac?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 12:30:01 PST