Re: [NTLK] 2000 or 2100

From: David M. Ensteness (denstene_at_mac.com)
Date: Sat Aug 21 2004 - 17:17:27 PDT

• Next message: Dave Bellamy: "[NTLK] Dumb Question Time"
• Previous message: Fred Bauman: "[NTLK] 2000 or 2100"
• In reply to: Fred Bauman: "[NTLK] 2000 or 2100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

A 2000U as the upgraded models are often referred to is the same as a
2100 internally.

So to your first question - no.

To your second - you would be happy with it.

David

On Aug 21, 2004, at 7:11 PM, Fred Bauman wrote:

> If I want to use a Newton to sync with my G4 iMac is there any reason
> to choose a 2100 over an upgraded 2000?
> What should I look out for as far as deal killing limitations, or would
> I be happy with the upgraded 2000?
>
> Thanks,
> Fred Bauman

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

• Next message: Dave Bellamy: "[NTLK] Dumb Question Time"
• Previous message: Fred Bauman: "[NTLK] 2000 or 2100"
• In reply to: Fred Bauman: "[NTLK] 2000 or 2100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 21 2004 - 18:30:01 PDT