Re: [NTLK] Microsoft MN-520 successful

From: Michael Hackett (mjhackett_at_mac.com)
Date: Thu Aug 26 2004 - 09:38:42 PDT

Next message: Steele Campbell: "Re: [NTLK] eudora for newton"
Previous message: Sonny Hung: "Re: [NTLK] Help needed with a LINKSYS WPC11 v.4 and eMate"
Maybe in reply to: Martin Howard: "[NTLK] Microsoft MN-520 successful"
Next in thread: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Microsoft MN-520 successful"
Reply: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Microsoft MN-520 successful"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

The MN-520 Wireless Notebook Adapter fits easily into the eMate.

- Mike

Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:04:44 -0500
From: "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop_at_ninehells.com>
Subject: Re: [NTLK] Microsoft MN-520 successful

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:55:55PM -0400, Victor Rehorst wrote:
> What matters is the thickness of the right tab. If it is 'thick' (at
> least
> half as thick as the connector) then it is a 3.3V operation card. If
> it is
> 'thin' then it is a 5V card or 5V/3.3V card.

All three tabs look the same size.

> A better way to answer this is: does it fit in an eMate?

Send me an eMate and I'll test it for you. (:

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Steele Campbell: "Re: [NTLK] eudora for newton"
Previous message: Sonny Hung: "Re: [NTLK] Help needed with a LINKSYS WPC11 v.4 and eMate"
Maybe in reply to: Martin Howard: "[NTLK] Microsoft MN-520 successful"
Next in thread: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Microsoft MN-520 successful"
Reply: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Microsoft MN-520 successful"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 26 2004 - 10:00:03 PDT