Re: [NTLK] is the Assist function useful?

From: Jon Glass (jonglass_at_usa.net)
Date: Thu Aug 26 2004 - 23:10:18 PDT

Next message: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] is the Assist function useful?"
Previous message: Molachi_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] new to list"
In reply to: George Bingham: "Re: [NTLK] is the Assist function useful?"
Next in thread: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] is the Assist function useful?"
Reply: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] is the Assist function useful?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Aug 26, 2004, at 8:37 PM, George Bingham wrote:

> Yeah, you're right it's built in to the Newton, but to my knowledge
> it only becomes very workable when you add the extension that turns
> the volume up on the dialing tones it generates.

Aha. But you know, I never had this problem on my 120 and 130. I don't
remember trying it with my 2100, so you may be right....

-- 
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<jonglass_at_usa.net>
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] is the Assist function useful?"
Previous message: Molachi_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] new to list"
In reply to: George Bingham: "Re: [NTLK] is the Assist function useful?"
Next in thread: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] is the Assist function useful?"
Reply: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] is the Assist function useful?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 26 2004 - 23:30:01 PDT