Re: [NTLK] question about serving

From: W L (vitcitylb_at_earthlink.net)
Date: Sat Dec 11 2004 - 01:43:01 PST

• Next message: W L: "Re: [NTLK] NUdrop Pkg Recovered (Was... NewtonIM etc)"
• Previous message: rplume_at_sympatico.ca: "[NTLK] Not quite a Newton"
• In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] question about serving"
• Next in thread: paul oberman: "Re: [NTLK] question about serving"
• Reply: paul oberman: "Re: [NTLK] question about serving"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Yupppppppppppppppppppppppp

Whoops, too much speed... ;-)

BTW, Ed K. has a great site, on a newton server...

the speed is great, especially when you try to use a non-amped. newton,
then you wonder why it took so long. :-)

I got 5 AMP21K's... ;-) 3 used every day, 2 backups, can't stand the
162-mhz...too slow... :-D

Robert Benschop wrote:
> On 5-dec-04, at 20:47, paul oberman wrote:
>
>>I am going to set up a Newton server, with a 2100. how much
>>difference does
>>a 220mhz upgrade make for speed and usability?
>
>
> Anybody with a sped-up 2x00 apparently never ever wants to go back.
>
>
> Robert Benschop
>

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

• Next message: W L: "Re: [NTLK] NUdrop Pkg Recovered (Was... NewtonIM etc)"
• Previous message: rplume_at_sympatico.ca: "[NTLK] Not quite a Newton"
• In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] question about serving"
• Next in thread: paul oberman: "Re: [NTLK] question about serving"
• Reply: paul oberman: "Re: [NTLK] question about serving"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Dec 11 2004 - 13:00:01 PST