From: James Nichols (smilr_at_mac.com)
Date: Sat Feb 07 2004 - 14:10:37 PST
And 10.2 was a speed demon compared to 10.1, and 10.1 was better than
public beta - all because the core elements of os X are relatively new
beasts (despite having a nice *nix pedigree) and Apple has put a lot of
energy into tweaking and improving them between each release - not just
slapping new features and security patches on like the Microsoft seems
to be doing these days.
On Feb 7, 2004, at 3:41 PM, Robert Benschop wrote:
> On 7-feb-04, at 22:10, Norman Palardy wrote:
>> Linux and Mac OS do this quite frequently (10.3 is much faster than
>> 10.2 on the same hardware)
>
> Though I'm a Mac fanatic, I like to be fair too. Part of why 10.3 runs
> faster is that 10.2 was pretty good but no speed demon...
>
>
> Robert Benschop
>
> --
> This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all
> inquiries
> List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
> Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
>
--- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Feb 07 2004 - 14:30:01 PST