Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for ma c)

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Tue Feb 17 2004 - 10:54:10 PST

Next message: Alexander Schreiber: "Re: [NTLK] OT Palm dropping support for mac"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for mac)"
In reply to: Humphreys, David (URB): "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for ma c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 17-feb-04, at 19:31, Humphreys, David (URB) wrote:
> N.B. DAT specs are better than CD but the the emphasis was on CD's so
> I didn't mention DAT.

Now I have friends that swear (again by listening) that DAT is the only
digital audio format that they like.
Can you tell us what the difference is between DAT and CD specs?

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Alexander Schreiber: "Re: [NTLK] OT Palm dropping support for mac"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for mac)"
In reply to: Humphreys, David (URB): "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for ma c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 17 2004 - 11:30:01 PST