Re: [NTLK] "Where would Newton would be today.." (was newt in macworld swe

From: Joel M. Sciamma (joel_at_inventors-emporium.co.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 23 2004 - 07:48:53 PST

• Next message: Nathan Turnage: "Re: [NTLK] "Where would Newton would be today.." (was newt in macworld swe"
• Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] QuickFigurePro"
• Next in thread: Nathan Turnage: "Re: [NTLK] "Where would Newton would be today.." (was newt in macworld swe"
• Reply: Nathan Turnage: "Re: [NTLK] "Where would Newton would be today.." (was newt in macworld swe"
• Reply: Jared Bland: "[NTLK] Apple, Design and "Different" (Was: "Where would Newton would be today)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Jim,

> More mysteries.. "$#%@ why doesn't Jobs just bring back NS as an
> alternative to AppleScript!

Apple are simply not quite the company they once were.

They seem to have few aspirations to lay down these kinds of core
technologies. iLife is where it's at - apparently.

I'm sure they are doing their best but never have I felt so out of tune with
what Apple are doing.

Joel.

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: Nathan Turnage: "Re: [NTLK] "Where would Newton would be today.." (was newt in macworld swe"
• Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] QuickFigurePro"
• Next in thread: Nathan Turnage: "Re: [NTLK] "Where would Newton would be today.." (was newt in macworld swe"
• Reply: Nathan Turnage: "Re: [NTLK] "Where would Newton would be today.." (was newt in macworld swe"
• Reply: Jared Bland: "[NTLK] Apple, Design and "Different" (Was: "Where would Newton would be today)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 23 2004 - 12:00:02 PST