From: James Nichols (smilr_at_mac.com)
Date: Mon Feb 23 2004 - 14:13:56 PST
That WOULD change things - and I DO AGREE that piracy is illegal - the
problem is that NOTHING will change as it is now.
People still only have a couple of sources for legit music - so they
almost HAVE to support the moguls - and if they don't want to -
they're SOL. A boycott would be nice - but enough people won't do that
these days - they want their music, so we get split into those of us
fed up with (or poor, or cheap or whatever) enough to boycott / pirate
and those who still purchase music.
What we need isn't a way to nuke piracy (although one that worked and
didn't infringe on personal rights would be nice) what we need is
CHOICE when purchasing a bands music - more than one record label, and
no collusion between em.
Any bets on which one could happen first?
On Feb 23, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Peter Cameron wrote:
> on 23/02/04 12:53 PM, James Nichols at smilr_at_mac.com wrote:
>> The problem is that the consumers still want their music, and have few
>> options other than the (ethically corrupt?) media moguls as suppliers.
> Stop buying. An organized boycott would change things quite
> quickly.
>
> Peter
>
> --
> This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all
> inquiries
> List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
> Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
>
--- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 23 2004 - 14:30:02 PST