Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] macworld 04 pix

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Mon Jan 12 2004 - 03:22:43 PST

Next message: Chris Edwards: "Re: [NTLK] Returned mail: User unknown/Caretech@rogers.com"
Previous message: doppler: "Re: [NTLK] X"
In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] macworld 04 pix"
Next in thread: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] macworld 04 pix"
Reply: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] macworld 04 pix"
Reply: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] macworld 04 pix"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 11-jan-04, at 7:31, Jon Glass wrote:
> While I can understand the "no easter egg" policy, (there have been
> some
> eggs in the past that caused nasty bugs or got Apple in trouble) I
> don't
> understand the business reasons for no credits...

Apple lost too many developers to competitors AFAIK

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Chris Edwards: "Re: [NTLK] Returned mail: User unknown/Caretech@rogers.com"
Previous message: doppler: "Re: [NTLK] X"
In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] macworld 04 pix"
Next in thread: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] macworld 04 pix"
Reply: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] macworld 04 pix"
Reply: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] macworld 04 pix"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 12 2004 - 09:00:01 PST