From: Woody Smith (woody_at_bitstream.net)
Date: Mon Jan 26 2004 - 21:10:40 PST
Hi Anil
I recently got a 130 after using a 2100 for about two years, and I
still use it, but I prefer the 130 for books.
Most of the packages that I use on my 2100 run just fine on the 130.
Including games, books and calendar. HWR in notes is quite good.
The two abilities that I notice that it lacks are NewtWorks and
ethernet. It is also a bit fussier about which linear flash cards that
it can use. It also has a silk screened silver bar so you cannot
rearrange the icons, I got around that by using i++ for more
flexability.
Woody
USA MN
On Monday, January 26, 2004, at 05:27 PM, Anil wrote:
> Thanks Peter, but can anyone shed any light on what the differences
> actually are. Other than the revision numbers.
>
> I have bought a MP 130, which I should receive shortly, and thought of
> saving myself a lot of trouble trying to get it to be functionally the
> same as my MP 2100. If the OS version won't allow feature parity.
>
>
> Kindest regards
>
> Anil K Solanki
> United Kingdom, MP 2100, MP 130
>
>
> On Jan 26, 2004, at 23:07, Peter Cameron wrote:
>
>> on 26/01/04 4:42 PM, Newtopia at MicroSSG_at_Comcast.net wrote:
>>> 2.0 runs on the 120 & 130, but can't run on 2x00 MP's.
>>> 2.1 runs on the 2x00, but not on any prior MP.
>> And then there's OS 2.2 on the eMate.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
> --
> This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all
> inquiries
> List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
> Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
>
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 26 2004 - 21:30:01 PST