From: Martin Joseph (martyNT_at_barknaturalpet.com)
Date: Wed Jan 28 2004 - 19:50:26 PST
On Jan 28, 2004, at 3:50 PM, Len Cole wrote:
>
>
> Strange then that OS X 10.1.x *does* run on a 7600 as well as it
> does on a 73/75/85/86/95/9600 and *doesn't* run reliably on a 6400,
> which supposedly has the same motherboard as the TAM.
>
>
> On January 29 2004, Sushi <Sushi_at_ragingbull.com> wrote:
>
>> The TAM is so much more than a 7600 in too many ways to describe here.
The catalyst motherboard used in the TAM and the 6400 is crap in my
opinion. It's seems to be derived from the performa 630 family, which
was a brilliant design for the 68000, but was never intended for the
PowerPC.
It looks cool, and certainly presages many futuristic design elements,
but the guts of it are lame.
Marty
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 28 2004 - 20:30:02 PST