Re: [NTLK] Newton C/C++ and NTK development

From: Eckhart Köppen (eck1001_at_gmx.net)
Date: Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:40:23 PDT


On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:04:14 +0200, Paul Guyot wrote:
> In most case, it means extra work to ensure that the protocol part is
> installed and active, but it can be justified because the protocol
> part can be used separately. It is definitely the case for the MP3
> codec and MADMax. I'm not sure that it's the case for Blunt, though,
> and it wasn't the case for LPR so I merged both parts into the
> resulting package.

The issue with Blunt and Nitro is that the protocol parts are different
for the different Newton models. I guess we could come up with some
sort of universal jumptable or stub library, which would be a nice
thing to have in general.

Eckhart

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 20 2004 - 05:30:01 PDT