Re: [NTLK] [ANN] Blunt 0.5

From: Eckhart Köppen (eck1001_at_gmx.net)
Date: Fri Mar 12 2004 - 11:27:12 PST

Next message: kareljansens: "Re: [NTLK] weird HWR problem"
Previous message: Cheezy: "[NTLK] Newton connection to BeOS ?"
In reply to: Russell,Allen: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] Blunt 0.5"
Next in thread: David Abramowitz: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] Blunt 0.5"
Reply: David Abramowitz: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] Blunt 0.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:24:36 -0500, Russell,Allen wrote:
> there are two of them, the older BT2000e, and a newer BT2000c. It came up
> there because the newer one isn't compatible with the Zaurus. The old one
> has a "smaller" black antenna and no LED. The newer one has a larger
> translucent purple antenna and has an LED.

I've got a BT2000-CF card working here (the newer one), it's got the
purple antenna and LED. Looks exactly like this:

http://www.ambicom.com/products/air2net/bt2000cf.html

Eckhart

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: kareljansens: "Re: [NTLK] weird HWR problem"
Previous message: Cheezy: "[NTLK] Newton connection to BeOS ?"
In reply to: Russell,Allen: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] Blunt 0.5"
Next in thread: David Abramowitz: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] Blunt 0.5"
Reply: David Abramowitz: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] Blunt 0.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 12 2004 - 12:30:02 PST