From: Julian Wright (julianwr_at_paradise.net.nz)
Date: Wed Mar 17 2004 - 14:46:06 PST
Martin Joseph wrote:
> I expect "FORGET IT" is the correct answer to this question.
>
> Not enough horsepower to move around thicker bitmaps is my guess...
> Plus it would multiply up pretty quickly with regards to storage.
It's been done on a 26MHz ARM2 based computer in the past, and most
effectively, by just caching bitmaps for the needed characters on demand.
Never say never. :)
Julian
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:00:02 PST