From: Zachery Bir (zbir_at_urbanape.com)
Date: Tue May 11 2004 - 10:22:10 PDT
On May 11, 2004, at 1:04 PM, Paul Guyot wrote:
> What is doable is:
> (b) to replace NTK with something else capable of compiling
> NewtonScript code.
>
> (b) probably would be more fun. Plus the NewtonScript compiler's
> native code generation definitely could be improved. Even generated
> bytecode could be improved. Additionally, since this would requires a
> NewtonScript interpreter as well, we would have an open source
> NewtonScript toolchain that could be used in totally different
> contexts.
Would this allow for larger/speedier apps than can be had via Newt?
> How much free time do you have in your hands? :)
Heh. Not as much as I'd like, but as much as I can get.
Zac
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 11 2004 - 11:00:01 PDT