Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!

From: Peter Cameron (pdwc_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: Sat May 15 2004 - 09:21:31 PDT

• Next message: David Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!"
• Previous message: Richard Clark: "[NTLK] Frank Grundel and MP130"
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel Jagendorf: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!"
• Next in thread: David Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!"
• Reply: David Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

David Ensteness wrote:
>Now now, we just ended the morals and nudity and sex thread, no reason
>to get into subjects like moist.
     Moistness and nudity could get us back to pornography and sex and
morals and then the whole scripture thing would start up again.

Peter

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

• Next message: David Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!"
• Previous message: Richard Clark: "[NTLK] Frank Grundel and MP130"
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel Jagendorf: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!"
• Next in thread: David Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!"
• Reply: David Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 15 2004 - 09:30:01 PDT