Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!

From: Sushi (Sushi_at_ragingbull.com)
Date: Sat May 15 2004 - 10:32:39 PDT


>David Ensteness wrote:
>>Now now, we just ended the morals and nudity and sex thread, no reason
>>to get into subjects like moist.
> Moistness and nudity could get us back to pornography and sex and
>morals and then the whole scripture thing would start up again.
>
>Peter

Who cares.

As long as the message is marked OT, then what is the problem?

Sushi

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 15 2004 - 11:00:01 PDT