Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!

From: Sushi (Sushi_at_ragingbull.com)
Date: Sat May 15 2004 - 18:24:30 PDT

Next message: John Anderson: "[NTLK] Where to go from here?"
Previous message: Brian Andrews: "[NTLK] WTB: 2100/2000 or MP 130"
Maybe in reply to: Daniel Jagendorf: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Good point.

Maybe Victor can create two digest modes.

One that includeds messages marked with OT and that does not include
messages marked with OT.

Then the list members who desire to subscribe to the digest mode can
select the digest mode that meets their needs best.

Sushi

>On 5/16/04 @ 2:43 AM, David Ensteness wrote:
>
>Over loading digests is one problem ....
>
>> Who cares.
>> As long as the message is marked OT, then what is the problem?
>> Sushi

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: John Anderson: "[NTLK] Where to go from here?"
Previous message: Brian Andrews: "[NTLK] WTB: 2100/2000 or MP 130"
Maybe in reply to: Daniel Jagendorf: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Morals?, no Spellcheck!"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun May 16 2004 - 01:00:02 PDT