Re: [NTLK] 2100 anti-glare removal?

From: Steele Campbell (the.vampire_at_gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 03 2004 - 16:18:49 PST

• Next message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] enroute and jpeg"
• Previous message: Chris Edwards: "[NTLK] leaving for a while"
• In reply to: LAG: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 anti-glare removal?"
• Next in thread: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 anti-glare removal?"
• Reply: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 anti-glare removal?"
• Reply: Woody Smith: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 anti-glare removal?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

You know LAG, I was thinking the same thing. WOuldn't such a remover
work, if not perfectly, at least passably?

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

• Next message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] enroute and jpeg"
• Previous message: Chris Edwards: "[NTLK] leaving for a while"
• In reply to: LAG: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 anti-glare removal?"
• Next in thread: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 anti-glare removal?"
• Reply: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 anti-glare removal?"
• Reply: Woody Smith: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 anti-glare removal?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 04 2004 - 00:00:01 PST