Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times

From: Brian Pearce (bpearce_at_cloud9.net)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2004 - 07:15:56 PST

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Previous message: Sarfaraz Dawoodi: "Re: [NTLK] Newt potentially for sale"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Incremental improvements? I think that from from the 100 to the 2x00
> series there was quite a bit more than an incremental improvement.

To us, to people that *use* the product, sure -- it makes a world of
difference. But to people without a vested interest in the product or
platform, I think those details would be mostly superfluous. I think
all they really need to know is that the 2x00 runs rings around the
initial model that failed.

BRIAN/bpearce_at_cloud9.net
<http://www.redjacketpress.com>

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Previous message: Sarfaraz Dawoodi: "Re: [NTLK] Newt potentially for sale"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 04 2004 - 08:00:01 PST