Re: [NTLK] [OT]Newton in the New York Times

From: Ed Kummel (tech_ed_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2004 - 17:14:35 PST

Next message: Mike Detlefsen: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Previous message: Mark Ross: "Re: [NTLK] anti-glare removal? - how many chemists are on this list anyway??"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Next in thread: Albert Muniz: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I was going to reply to this...but I'm just too
lazy...oh crap...I already did...oh well, at least I
didn't do too much work.
;-P
--- Robert Benschop <rbenschop_at_telebyte.nl> wrote:
<snip>
> Hm, if we accept lazy journalism aren't we a lazy
> public? And isn't a
> lazy/uninterested public the worst thing that can
> happen to a society?
>
>
> Robert Benschop

=====
"A democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding on what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the results of the decision."
- Benjamin Franklin

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Mike Detlefsen: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Previous message: Mark Ross: "Re: [NTLK] anti-glare removal? - how many chemists are on this list anyway??"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Next in thread: Albert Muniz: "Re: [NTLK] Newton in the New York Times"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 04 2004 - 17:30:00 PST