Re: [NTLK] Lowest profile WiFi card (and a BT question)...

From: Roman Pixell (roman_at_pixell.net)
Date: Sun Oct 10 2004 - 16:00:10 PDT

Next message: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] AirPort Express and Newton"
Previous message: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] Lowest profile WiFi card (and a BT question)..."
In reply to: Michael Hackett: "Re: [NTLK] Lowest profile WiFi card (and a BT question)..."
Next in thread: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] Lowest profile WiFi card (and a BT question)..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Oct 10, 2004, at 9:59 PM, Michael Hackett wrote:

> What about 3Com's XJACK cards, which have retractable antennas? They
> aren't listed in the MoreWifi compatibility list, but the specs say
> "16-bit PC card (3.3 V)". Maybe someone else can interpret.
>
> http://www.3com.com/products/en_US/detail.jsp?
> tab=prodspec&sku=3CRWE62092B

me and eckhart tried to make blunt to work on a similar bluetooth card,
but it did not succeed.
i never tried the 802.11b card in a newt, though.

/ ®

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] AirPort Express and Newton"
Previous message: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] Lowest profile WiFi card (and a BT question)..."
In reply to: Michael Hackett: "Re: [NTLK] Lowest profile WiFi card (and a BT question)..."
Next in thread: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] Lowest profile WiFi card (and a BT question)..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 10 2004 - 16:30:01 PDT