Re: [NTLK] [OT] lego

From: Martin Joseph (martyNT_at_barknaturalpet.com)
Date: Fri Dec 23 2005 - 12:32:08 PST

• Next message: William Pociengel: "Re: [NTLK] 2 questions"
• Previous message: hellsop_at_ninehells.com: "Re: [NTLK] [FS] NewtUSB available"
• In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] lego"
• Next in thread: L.W. Brown: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] lego"
• Reply: L.W. Brown: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] lego"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Although you might be building Newton stands with them, this is
probably a good example of a thread that should now be marked [OT]...

I might be a dick, but at least I am consistent.

Happy Holiday to all...

Marty

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

• Next message: William Pociengel: "Re: [NTLK] 2 questions"
• Previous message: hellsop_at_ninehells.com: "Re: [NTLK] [FS] NewtUSB available"
• In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] lego"
• Next in thread: L.W. Brown: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] lego"
• Reply: L.W. Brown: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] lego"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 25 2005 - 13:30:04 PST