[NTLK] 2000 vs 2100

From: Brian Pierro (bpierro_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: Mon Feb 07 2005 - 20:21:47 PST

• Next message: James Nichols: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs 2100"
• Previous message: James Nichols: "Re: [NTLK] New-ton 2000 user"
• Next in thread: James Nichols: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs 2100"
• Reply: James Nichols: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs 2100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I just got my first 2000 and have read a ton about them online. So I
was wondering what really are the differences between the two? Why
would I really want a 2100 or to upgrade the 2000? Cant I just use the
ATA flash card driver and have way more memory than I really need and
therefore not need the 2100 upgrade? Was it just useful back then but
not so much now?

Does that make sense? Thanks for the answers.
Brian Pierro

I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're
going and hook up with 'em later. -- Mitch Hedberg

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

• Next message: James Nichols: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs 2100"
• Previous message: James Nichols: "Re: [NTLK] New-ton 2000 user"
• Next in thread: James Nichols: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs 2100"
• Reply: James Nichols: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs 2100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 07 2005 - 21:00:01 PST