From: Riccardo Mori (rick_at_poc.it)
Date: Mon Jun 13 2005 - 19:10:17 PDT
Mechcozmo wrote:
>> That is the way obsolete mac hardware works (ie xpostfacto on older
>> macs can run 10.4 we are just unsupported).
>
> Isn't it painfully slow to run Tiger on even the bottom of the line
> G3s? I know that on the flower-power iMacs, Panther was pretty
> slow.=20
> But going even slower?
>
> So, do tell. How does it run?
on a clamshell iBook SE 466 firewire, Tiger runs pretty well. :)
i used Xpostfacto to install Mac OS X 10.1 on a Powermac 9500/132. the
overall performance is surprisingly good. the only pain is the
optimization after installing any package. it takes ages to complete. i
also tried to install Jaguar, but the Powermac looks happier with Mac
OS X 10.1.5.
r.
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 13 2005 - 19:30:00 PDT