Re: [NTLK] OT: why not the Palm T|X, though it has appeal

From: John Hay (OceanCity_at_mac.com)
Date: Thu Oct 13 2005 - 06:36:05 PDT

Next message: Goodwin, Greg P.: "Re: [NTLK] OT: why not the Palm T|X, though it has appeal"
Previous message: Michael C. Wittmann: "[NTLK] OT: why not the Palm T|X, though it has appeal"
In reply to: Michael C. Wittmann: "[NTLK] OT: why not the Palm T|X, though it has appeal"
Next in thread: Goodwin, Greg P.: "Re: [NTLK] OT: why not the Palm T|X, though it has appeal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael,

Good going, great review, thank you.

John

10/13/05 Michael C. Wittmann issued the following and I have taken
literary license to pass it along on a "Need to Know Basis" . . . ?

> It's a
>design difference, and the basic philosophy of the Newton wins for
>me. It's the UI, stupid.
>

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Goodwin, Greg P.: "Re: [NTLK] OT: why not the Palm T|X, though it has appeal"
Previous message: Michael C. Wittmann: "[NTLK] OT: why not the Palm T|X, though it has appeal"
In reply to: Michael C. Wittmann: "[NTLK] OT: why not the Palm T|X, though it has appeal"
Next in thread: Goodwin, Greg P.: "Re: [NTLK] OT: why not the Palm T|X, though it has appeal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:05 PDT