If the author cared about the Newton community, he would have released
his driver as open source when he left behind his intentions of making
money off it.
Proprietary software is, to begin with, a piss take. If the world (of
computers) wasn't such a shitty place we wouldn't even need these 3rd
party drivers, there'd be ports of the official ones from the OEM.
And everyone would live happily ever after...
(In other words, I STRONGLY disagree with Sonny. But then I disagree
with private property, so...)
/Niklas
On 1/7/07, Roman Pixell [GMail] <roman.pixell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7 jan 2007, at 07.49, Douglas Starnes wrote:
>
> > The real question should no become "Is Hiroshi's WaveLAN driver
> > abandonware
> > and how can we make the determination
>
> i think it has been determined already by hiroshi himself.
>
>
> vänliga hälsningar / warmest regards,
>
> / (r)
>
>
> roman pixell, freelancer
> karmatic experience group
> kåkbrinken 11a 3tr
> 111 27 stockholm
>
> email: roman@pixell.net
> AIM: doppler@mac.com
> MSN: roman@pixell.net
> ICQ: 3698764
> skype: romanpixell
> cell: +46 709 10 35 51
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
> Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
> WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
>
>
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/Received on Sun Jan 7 09:06:00 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 07 2007 - 11:30:00 EST