Re: [NTLK] Bluetooth transfer rates?

ahhhh. now that I think about it, that makes PERFECT sense. With
WiFi, you have to have a network in place already.

/me makes note to self for trip this summer.

On 5/23/07, L.W. Brown <lwb@mac.com> wrote:
> And I have read there is greater BT success than with WiFi...
>
> On 24. May, 2007, at 0:37, Tony Kan wrote:
>
> > Good thing is: Most pkgs aren't very big. The less you use your
> > serial port
> > the less chance there is of damaging it.
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> With transfer rates so slow, is there any particular advantage to
> >> getting bluetooth other than the neato factor?
> --
> This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
> Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
> WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
>
>

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/