On 13.02.2009, at 05:13, L.W. Brown wrote:
> Which sounds like perhaps Avi's fix only caused a problem while the
> date rolled over this past Jan.1.
> If so, then could it be that there will not be another problem if the
> fix is installed this year?
> Has anyone faked a rollover from `09 to `10?
>
> On 12. Feb., 2009, at 22:58 PM, Tony Kan wrote:
>
>> Recall Eckhart has had a preliminary look at
>> the 2010 bug and believes that the boundary
>> problem bug in Avi's fix is fixable.
Avi's fix is a good approach, but it has two flaws IMHO:
1: it is too complicated. The introduction of hexades simply won't get
us anywhere. Existing software has no clue about hexades anyways.
2: it is programmed as an extension. It should however be a patch. The
difference is that an extension will be bound into the system at some
point after booting, so we can never be sure if another resource
already requested a (wrong) time before the extension was applied. A
ROM patch would persist through all kinds of reboots (except a brain
wipe) and would be available even at boot time. Constructing a patch
apparently is classified information.
Which leads to my plan: I would like to simplify Avi's extension and
convert it into a ROM patch.
---- http://robowerk.com/ ==================================================================== The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/ The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/ The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/ WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/ ====================================================================Received on Fri Feb 13 06:06:48 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 13 2009 - 19:30:01 EST