On 16.02.2009, at 12:17, lists@40hz.org wrote:
> I was able to recreate the original patch from the sources, and played
> around with some minor modifications. There are still open issues to
> be
> clarified, but it is for sure less black magic than anticipated.
WOW! Very good! I have a pretty good feeling about beeing able to fix
the interface between the OS-internal second counter (which does not
wrap) and the NewtonScript one, assuming that very few programmers
will have stored a date in soups using "seconds" instead of simply the
date.
There are really only two cases (i can think of) that may get in the
way of using a new start date for the "seconds" counter:
1: seconds used somewhere in a soup (which is unlikely)
2: seconds hardcoded somewhere inside a program (which is unlikely
except for licensing experation dates ;-)
so changeing the 0-second date may solve all our problems for the next
16 years - maybe.
Matthias
---- http://robowerk.com/ ==================================================================== The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/ The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/ The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/ WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/ ====================================================================Received on Mon Feb 16 08:56:48 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 16 2009 - 09:30:00 EST