[NTLK] Copyright Test [was h*cks, kr*ks, SN]

[Andy Hill]

Personally I am deeply disappointed by this. For me it's no different 
than archaeology. I can not see the injustice.

However if asking members to take the discussion about one single 
package, to a point of an actual decision  instead of the rhetoric,  is 
really that unpalatable then fair enough.

In my mind there is no law against discussion and I do not personally 
fear the consequences of it.

But I do acknowledge that I may be proposing a minority view so...

....on with the New, the Faster, the More, the iWhatever and let's leave 
the dead packages to history.

Andy

> ~~~ On 2010/01/21 23:28, Grant Hutchinson at grant at splorp.com wrote ~~~
>
>   
>>> Let's just end the whole thread right about now.
>>>       
>> I have to agree. This one has pretty much run its course.
>>
>>
>> Lord Groundhog wrote:
>> Once we established the correct circumstances and mechanism for its use, the
>> proxy-registration idea  
>>