[NTLK] OT: A Future That is a Singularity - Evolution
Andy Taylor
andy_otter at ntlworld.com
Wed Mar 31 09:47:30 EDT 2010
On 30 Mar 2010, at 11:40, Ryan wrote:
> I need to research time more, but from my undertanding, is time not an
> entity itself? And math can make predictions about things. In that way
> it addresses time.
What I meant, Ryan, when I was burbling on about "Mathematics sits
outside of time" is this:
In Physics, Biology, etc., we can meaningfully talk about 'actions'
and their 'consequences'. Some stuff happens after other stuff. This
is not the case in Mathematics; "if A then B" does not mean "if you do
A then B will happen", its means "if A is true, then B is also true".
As such, the totality of mathematical statements exist in a single
instant of time (or outside it if you prefer). In that sense, where
mathematical modelling makes a prediction, what it is doing is saying
"if you find that X is/was/will be true, then Y also is/was/will be
true".
Subtle, but I think true!
Thanks, Bob, for the wikipedia link.
I love that aspect of mathematics and its apparent underlying truth.
The way that what Galois was thinking up in the early 1800s turns up
over a century later to underly the operations on sub-atomic
particles. Etc, etc, etc.
But does it mean that anything mathematically true must find its use
later in a physical interpretation - Do mathematicians have a carte
blanche to wander off at tax-payers expense, secure in the knowledge
that the fundamental utility of their work is not only assured but
ultimately the responsibility of others to dis-cover and real-ise?!
More information about the NewtonTalk
mailing list