On Fri, Aug 4, 2000 Chris Browder wrote:
-----------
>I beta tested NCQ and loved it. The author is thinking of making a AIM
>plug-in as well as MSN-Messenger. I think NCQ has been written better than
>Jabber merly because it's way out of Beta and was in beta less time. I could
>be wrong, Jabber is like IRC... IRC is great, but I never really cared for
>it. But it works.... I'll retry Jabber on my PC and Newton agai (yes I have
>a PC in the bedroom... it's my dads....)
-----------
I agree. I too beta tested NCQ, and was glad to pay the small fee of $20 to an active Newton proqramer. NCO, is indeed well done and has more features than NCQ on Newton Jabber, but let us not forget that the whole Jabber thing is still a project. I use Jabber because of its support of Yahoo and AOL, and credit to Eric for giving us a great product. If NCQ would do AIM. then by all meens I would love that.
What was that about a PC in your bedroom; sleeping with a PC! ...yuck ;)
Dr. Khaled Tewfik
================
Sent from an Apple Newton Message Pad 2100.
Dr. Khaled Tewfik
================
Sent from an Apple Newton Message Pad 2100.
***************************************
NewtonTalk brought to you by:
EVOTE.COM -- the ESPN of politics on the Internet! All the players, all the news, and the hottest analysis and features (plus 'toons!) anywhere.... visit http://www.evote.com today!
***************************************
Need Subscribe/Unsubscribe info?
Visit the NewtonTalk section at http://www.planetnewton.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 01 2000 - 00:00:11 CDT