[NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)

From: Tom Wilkinson (tom_wilkinson_at_canada.com)
Date: Mon Aug 20 2001 - 13:48:30 EDT

Next message: Judy Perry: "Re: [NTLK] A Messagepad for my wife! But which one?!"
Previous message: Ivan Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] looking for a clip-on holder"
Next in thread: Brad Tober: "Re: [NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)"
Reply: Brad Tober: "Re: [NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)"
Maybe reply: rminton_at_commscope.com: "Re: [NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I was comparing the screen contrast of my MP120 to my friend's 2000 over the
weekend, and my 120 seemed quite a bit brighter when compared to the 2000
without using the backlight. Is my friend's 2000 misadjusted. She tried
adjusting the contrast, but without the backlight, she could not make it
near as bright as the MP120.
Any thoughts on this?
Tom

__________________________________________________________
Get your FREE personalized e-mail at http://www.canada.com

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Judy Perry: "Re: [NTLK] A Messagepad for my wife! But which one?!"
Previous message: Ivan Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] looking for a clip-on holder"
Next in thread: Brad Tober: "Re: [NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)"
Reply: Brad Tober: "Re: [NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)"
Maybe reply: rminton_at_commscope.com: "Re: [NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:47:24 EDT