Re: [NTLK] Checking in / iPod Comments...

• Next message: The Compulsive Splicer: "Re: [NTLK] Checking in / iPod Comments..."
• Previous message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Checking in / iPod Comments..."
• In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Checking in / iPod Comments..."
• Next in thread: The Compulsive Splicer: "Re: [NTLK] Checking in / iPod Comments..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Robert Benschop wrote:
> Got it from a local Newspaper clipping, been looking for it since and it
> seems gone, so no technical backup apart from the fact that the majority of
> people listening to SACD in blind tests easily pick it out as superior to
> CD, if everything is on a CD, than why the difference ?
SACD uses higher sampling rate as well as more bits and I think a more dense
writing on the CD too. I saw a SONY Super-CD burner for 1.?GB per CD.

-- 
With best regards / Viele Gruesse
Marco Mailand
http://slsbd.psi.ch/timing
--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

• Next message: The Compulsive Splicer: "Re: [NTLK] Checking in / iPod Comments..."
• Previous message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Checking in / iPod Comments..."
• In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Checking in / iPod Comments..."
• Next in thread: The Compulsive Splicer: "Re: [NTLK] Checking in / iPod Comments..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:02:57 EST