Re: [NTLK] Newton vs. Palm - Just for the record

From: Mikebridg_at_aol.com
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 17:52:34 EST

Next message: Dustin Long: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Happy birthday Hal"
Previous message: Andrew Beals: "Re: [NTLK] Re - Strength in numbers"
Maybe in reply to: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] Newton vs. Palm - Just for the record"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 14/1/02 9:33:16 pm, onefishtwofish_at_mac.com writes:

<< Okay, I read this through twice before I figured out sank is the past
tense form of sync. Really, I was sooo lost. >>

I was lost for a time! would it be better to spell it 'sanc' then it couldn't
be confused with 'sank'. What's wrong with synced anyway - its better
grammer;>)

Mike

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Dustin Long: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Happy birthday Hal"
Previous message: Andrew Beals: "Re: [NTLK] Re - Strength in numbers"
Maybe in reply to: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] Newton vs. Palm - Just for the record"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 16:02:33 EST