> Yeah, today that is true. I think the author meant the NOS 1.x
> recognition, which was a pain.
But didn't the article mention (or show) a 2100? The original HW was
bad (but might still have been better than anything else out there), but
the 210 improved on it greatly as well as having a faster processor.
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:02:33 EST