on 3/11/02 8:39 PM, James Witte at jswitte_at_bloomington.in.us wrote:
> But didn't the article mention (or show) a 2100? The original HW was
> bad (but might still have been better than anything else out there), but
> the 210 improved on it greatly as well as having a faster processor.
Of course, did the article say anything about how not one of the current
offerings even _pretend_ do do genuine handwriting recognition? I mean, the
Newton was HWR from the ground up. Everything out there today is just a
shadow of the Newton's HWR, or, probably more accurately, on a different
page than the Newton.
-- Jon Glass Krakow, Poland <jonglass_at_usa.net> <glasshaus5_at_aol.com>
'A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader." -- Samuel Adams
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:02:35 EST