Re: [NTLK] Browser

From: Steve Weyer (weyer_at_kagi.com)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 17:00:42 EST

Next message: Steve Weyer: "Re: [NTLK] UNNA packages & an introduction"
Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] UNNA structure (was: High quality newton logo?)"
Maybe in reply to: Rolf Brakvatne: "[NTLK] Browser"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:24:52 -0500
> From: John Goggan <jgoggan_at_dcg.com>

> As an interesting side note -- I thought that Newt's Cape was HTTP 1.1
> compatible? If so, then why does it also send "HTTP/1.0" in the GET request?
> Or am I using an old version (Newt's Cape/2.1eX-2(NIE)) or something?

even though Newt's Cape handles some HTTP 1.1 header fields,
it isn't fully HTTP 1.1 compliant, so it just claims to be HTTP/1.0

-- Steve weyer_at_kagi.com Newton apps/tools: Newt's Cape, newtVNC, NewtDevEnv, Sloup, Crypto,... http://www.kagi.com/weyer/

-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

Next message: Steve Weyer: "Re: [NTLK] UNNA packages & an introduction"
Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] UNNA structure (was: High quality newton logo?)"
Maybe in reply to: Rolf Brakvatne: "[NTLK] Browser"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:02:34 EST