Re: [NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?

From: Peter Cameron (pdwc_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 17:27:47 EST

Next message: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] Re - FITALY"
Previous message: Varun Mehta: "Re: [NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Maybe in reply to: Varun Mehta: "[NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Next in thread: John Acuff: "Re: [NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Varun Mehta <varun_at_mehtasw.com> wrote:
> I have a great universal AC adaptor, which would
> hopefully work fine.
   These are not a great idea _ see the archives for previous debates on this issue.
   Get a battery cage, some good rechargables and an external charger.
   You can't recharge in the Newt unless you have either a Newton battery pack or a modified battery cage so the AC adapter isn't a main priority unless you have either of these.

Peter

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/

Next message: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] Re - FITALY"
Previous message: Varun Mehta: "Re: [NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Maybe in reply to: Varun Mehta: "[NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Next in thread: John Acuff: "Re: [NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 12:04:32 EST