Re: [NTLK] Nitro vs. Backtalk

From: tfbiii_at_nbscomputers.net
Date: Sat Apr 12 2003 - 17:36:50 PDT


Well - all USB cards I see are 32-bit, there's no way to run them in a
Newt. Bluetooth can be 16-bit, therefore, Newt-compatible
(hardware-wise)

What's the link for the Nitro site?

Fred

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Benschop [mailto:rbenschop_at_euronet.nl]=20
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2003 1:52 PM
To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
Subject: Re: [NTLK] Nitro vs Backtalk

On donderdag, apr 10, 2003, at 21:32 Europe/Amsterdam, Eckhart
K=3DF6ppen=3D20=3D

wrote:
> This is probably the biggest difference: Nitro and IC/VC are open=3D20
> source. If I decide to stop working on them (because I'm busy=3D20
> implementing something like a Bluetooth driver ;)

Would that be possible? Seems that the Newt would need USB first ;-)

Robert Benschop=3D

--=20
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all
inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 12 2003 - 18:30:00 PDT