Re: [NTLK] writers and newtons

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 11:19:50 PDT


On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 19:41 Europe/Amsterdam, Edward Humes
wrote:
> I've also experimented with just using inktext with scaling and
> deferred recognition (which means I don't have to worry about errors
> until later, and can then catch them all at once), but the real-time
> recognition seems to me to be a bit more accurate. I'm not sure why
> that would be the case, unless scaling interferes with recognition
> somehow. I think time and more usage will reveal whether there are
> shortcomings I haven't noticed or that haven't gotten on my nerves > yet.

Did you ever try with your Newt set to 'Sketches'? I love the feeling
of not having anything interfere so that it really feels like a
block-note while still easily converting it afterwards,
>
> I agree that oftentimes there is no substitute for scribbling on real
> paper (or envelope backs or napkins or whatever I can grab that's
> nearby) with real ink -- that's not something I could ever do without
> as a writer, nor would I want to.

See above.

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 14 2003 - 12:00:01 PDT