Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???

From: Doug Augustyn (optix_at_six5535.org)
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 08:20:34 PDT

Next message: Richard Clark: "Re: [NTLK] Rex 3 or 6000"
Previous message: Andrei Chichak: "Re: [NTLK] Kilometers (silly)"
In reply to: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Next in thread: Andrei Chichak: "[NTLK] Comments about maximum memory size"
Reply: Andrei Chichak: "[NTLK] Comments about maximum memory size"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Ignore that last comment, I neglected to RTFT.

Responding to Doug Augustyn's comment:
||Try installing System Update 710031.
||
||That helped when I had the same problem with my U2100.
||
||Responding to mmedina_(at)_selena.com.fr's comment:
||||
||||Hi Robert,
||||
||||thanks for the info.
||||At least I have ONE good 2100...
||||
||||It says " System RAM Installed 4020K ", and NewtTest confirms RAMSize
||||3.93Mbytes…
||||

-- 
My other computer is a Newton UMP2k
http://www.SiX5535.org
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Richard Clark: "Re: [NTLK] Rex 3 or 6000"
Previous message: Andrei Chichak: "Re: [NTLK] Kilometers (silly)"
In reply to: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Next in thread: Andrei Chichak: "[NTLK] Comments about maximum memory size"
Reply: Andrei Chichak: "[NTLK] Comments about maximum memory size"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 09:00:02 PDT