Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???

From: Doug Augustyn (optix_at_six5535.org)
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 07:47:35 PDT

Next message: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] Upgrading my MP2000 to a 2100"
Previous message: Chris Bonthron: "[NTLK] Upgrading my MP2000 to a 2100"
In reply to: mmedina_at_selena.com.fr: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Next in thread: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Reply: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Try installing System Update 710031.

That helped when I had the same problem with my U2100.

Responding to mmedina_(at)_selena.com.fr's comment:
||
||Hi Robert,
||
||thanks for the info.
||At least I have ONE good 2100...
||
||It says " System RAM Installed 4020K ", and NewtTest confirms RAMSize
||3.93Mbytes…
||

-- 
My other computer is a Newton UMP2k
http://www.SiX5535.org
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] Upgrading my MP2000 to a 2100"
Previous message: Chris Bonthron: "[NTLK] Upgrading my MP2000 to a 2100"
In reply to: mmedina_at_selena.com.fr: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Next in thread: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Reply: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 08:30:02 PDT