Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???

From: mmedina_at_selena.com.fr
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 07:18:00 PDT

Next message: Chris Bonthron: "[NTLK] Upgrading my MP2000 to a 2100"
Previous message: mmedina_at_selena.com.fr: "Re: [NTLK] "Slapping your cells silly""
Maybe in reply to: mmedina_at_selena.com.fr: "[NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Next in thread: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Reply: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi Robert,

thanks for the info.
At least I have ONE good 2100...

>Something wrong with that first 2100, the second is ok, you might want
>to check the 'Memory Info' bottom left of your 'Extras'
>It's a possibility that the first 2100 has a 2000 motherboard...

It says " System RAM Installed 4020K ", and NewtTest confirms RAMSize
3.93Mbytes…

So...
Help! :-)

Michel

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Chris Bonthron: "[NTLK] Upgrading my MP2000 to a 2100"
Previous message: mmedina_at_selena.com.fr: "Re: [NTLK] "Slapping your cells silly""
Maybe in reply to: mmedina_at_selena.com.fr: "[NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Next in thread: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Reply: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 12:00:03 PDT