Re: [NTLK] confused about rom 2.1

From: Frank Gruendel (fg2_at_pda-soft.de)
Date: Thu Feb 19 2004 - 12:23:37 PST

• Next message: David Abramowitz: "Re: [NTLK] -48022 and No Dates"
• Previous message: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] Re - Battery rebuilds"
• Maybe in reply to: nelson: "[NTLK] confused about rom 2.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> ok found a 2.1 rom in a 130, thought only 2000's had those.
> chip has v2.1 1995 apple on it.Nothing important just
> curious.

They are labeled 2.1, but they are 2.0 ROMs.

> Oh an Frank those u43's are tiny, didnt look disconected
> until i went to 10x magnifacation...

I know, I know. Some look perfect even under that magnification.
I always resolder them no matter how they look. Better to be on
the safe side. Don't forget to trim back the case support.

Frank

-- Newton Software and Hardware at http://www.pda-soft.de

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: David Abramowitz: "Re: [NTLK] -48022 and No Dates"
• Previous message: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] Re - Battery rebuilds"
• Maybe in reply to: nelson: "[NTLK] confused about rom 2.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 19 2004 - 13:00:01 PST