Re: [NTLK] Newton and BlueTooth--why?

From: RossO (newton_at_ordersomewherechaos.com)
Date: Wed Jan 21 2004 - 13:00:14 PST

• Next message: Dave Bellamy: "Re: [NTLK] X-Port with OS X?"
• Previous message: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] Newton and BlueTooth--why?"
• In reply to: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] Newton and BlueTooth--why?"
• Next in thread: Alan Davis: "Re: [NTLK] New to the group with questions"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Let's not forget that Bluetooth uses much less power than 802.11b
cards. So there's a good energy savings as well.

.r.

>> What does a theoretical BT capability for the Newton get me that
>> isn't solved by other forms of connection (serial, tcp/ip (wired and
>> unwired))?

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: Dave Bellamy: "Re: [NTLK] X-Port with OS X?"
• Previous message: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] Newton and BlueTooth--why?"
• In reply to: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] Newton and BlueTooth--why?"
• Next in thread: Alan Davis: "Re: [NTLK] New to the group with questions"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 21 2004 - 13:30:01 PST