From: Paul Guyot (pguyot_at_kallisys.net)
Date: Wed Sep 08 2004 - 06:55:07 PDT
Aux environs du 7/09/04 à 17:21 +0200, sous le titre "Re: [NTLK] WWNC
& Einstein", smoerk prit sa plus belle plume pour écrire les mots
suivants:
>I apologize for what i wrote in my last mail. I think I know too less
>about the topic and of course Paul and Nicolas can choose the license
>of their project. I was just a little bit dissapointed, that it's not
>open source (but somhow I expected it).
Oliver, what did you expect? Why are you disappointed?
I don't mean to sound rude, but after the DCL & Escale open source
experiment, I just do not want to hear about open sourcing code of
the Einstein project and/or the emulator again. Thanks.
Also, I'd like to stress again the fact that Einstein is not the 20K
or so lines we wrote for the emulator. However, the emulator is a
very important step even if NewtonOS will never get ported to other
hardware because it could be used as a debugging tool to fix at least
the factory calibration lost problem and the -10061 bug. It will also
be a great help for future system patches, allowing one to develop
them without taking the risk to toast any unit.
BTW, I did put my slides about Einstein (I'm waiting for other
speakers' slides and/or agreement to put theirs) on the conference
website.
http://wwnc.newtontalk.net/program/paulguyot/slides-paulguyot.pdf
Paul
-- Ceci est une signature banale. http://www.kallisys.com/ http://newton.kallisys.net:8080/ http://wwnc.newtontalk.net/ -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 08 2004 - 07:30:01 PDT